We hope to be celebrating but no matter what happens on 31st October we will be drinking great wine, feasting on cheese and charcuterie and enjoying a great evening.

Join us for our Autumn event to be held at 79, Corringway, Ealing, W5 3HB 7 p.m. til late!

We stand a real chance of winning in Ealing Central and Acton. But it will cost money.  

If you can donate something it will be very useful. 

On July 10th, Ealing Council's Labour cabinet confirmed they want to close Pitshanger Library.

The lease comes up for renew this December, and the council have said they won't renew it.

They claim they want to replace it with a smaller "community library", but this would be only staffed by volunteers and much smaller than the existing arrangement.

Action by local Lib Dem Councillor Jon Ball led to a developer paying £67,500 to Ealing Council for legal costs.

Jon slammed the Labour administration's failure to claim legal costs due from the developers behind a controversial planning scheme. The Council Leader then said British Land had promised him the money.

Cllr Ball commented, “This only happened because I kicked up a fuss. The fact that the Labour leader could get his developer pals to rescue him from political embarrassment shows just how close the relationship is between developers and Ealing Council bosses. I’m glad I spoke up to get £67,500 more to provide vital services for Ealing’s residents.”

“Faceless retail units and towers”

Cllr Ball added, "The 9-42 The Broadway scheme was a classic example of a scheme that was good for the developers but bad for Ealing. It was a proposal to demolish a large part of the Victorian heart of Ealing and replace it with faceless retail units and towers with only 27% of the flats being affordable. Disgracefully, rather than demanding more affordable housing and more facilities for residents, the administration welcomed this development with open arms and the Labour majority on the planning committee voted it through.

"Due to the national level of concern about the scheme, with Historic England and the Victorian Society both making scathing comments, in addition to local opposition spearheaded by the stirling work of local campaigning group Save Ealing’s Centre, the Secretary of State rightly called it in.

"This call-in showed once again that Ealing Council's planning system fails miserably when it comes to major schemes. Planning officers are too close to the Council's regeneration function to stand up to major developers and most Labour councillors are too supine to overturn bad officer recommendations in major schemes.

"I hoped that the planning inspector would throw this scheme out, but instead the developers withdrew it just one working day before the planning inquiry was due to start.

"The Secretary of State found that the withdrawal was “unreasonable” and found the developers liable to pay costs. Costs awards were made to the other parties, including donations to local good causes in recognition of the work done by SEC volunteers on preparing their case.

Administration “shamefully failed to claim what was due”

"However one name was missing from the list of cost awards, that of Ealing Council. It is shocking that the Council decided to spend £74,000 of council tax payers money fighting in support of the developers and against its own residents. It is doubly shocking that given the legal opportunity to recoup these costs due to the unreasonable actions of the developer, this administration instead took the decision to brazenly put the financial interests of its developer pals before the interests of hardworking local residents and shamefully failed to claim what was due to it until I stepped in.

"What does a property developer have to do to lose the backing of this administration if being declared to have acted unreasonably by a government minister is not enough?”

Cllr Ball added, “I’m delighted that the developers are now repaying Ealing Council £67,500 to compensate them for most of the legal costs involved, but this whole saga indicates just how pally the Labour administration is with major developers. I would like to thank Save Ealing Centre for spotting that Ealing Council failed to claim their costs.”

The London Mayor's plan to close Ealing and Southall police stations is totally unacceptable.  Ealing Labour council is offering no alternatives while people's safety and communities are being put at risk.  We have already lost our counter service at both Ealing and Southall police stations. Now the police stations will be closed.   

Local police stations create a visible presence. Officers spend more time in the area close to the station as officers come and go for their breaks and at the beginning and end of their shift. 

Buy tickets for the Cleveland Summer Barbeque on 23rd July. If you have any queries, please contact Francesco Fruzza ffruzza@aol.com or 07833 452 798.

Last month Ealing and Hillingdon selected their local London Assembly candidate for the upcoming elections on 5th May, Francesco Fruzza, a long time resident of West London.

 
Francesco Fruzza - Ealing & Hillingdon GLA Candidate

He has been an active campaigner in Ealing for over 20 years and, as a member of HealthWatch, is passionate about saving services at Ealing Hospital. Francesco along with Lib Dem Mayoral Candidate Caroline Pidgeon, will also campaign on issues such as introducing half price tube fares before 07:30, tackling London's air pollution, particularly around Heathrow, and prioritising the building of truly affordable homes across London.

This election is a key part of the #LibDemFightBack in London, especially as part of the vote is Proportional Representation. We have a real chance of winning seats, so that we can get on with dealing with London's housing crisis, fixing transport blackspots in West London, and improving air quality.

But first, we need to raise £1000 for the candidate deposit. If you can help us, even with just £10, you'll be getting us one step closer to getting more Liberal Democrats on the London Assembly.